honeycani

I think that the authors did a great job of combining all three strategies. I find its much easier to understand when the points rotate between them like describing Hillary Clintons 'dumpy pantsuit' and then using stats as evidence of female contributions to follow. I find these strategies the most useful when used together as opposed to just using logos or just using pathos etc. Hearing fact after fact after can become boring and tedious. The use of ethos within the argument of Sweden's political influences was also very well done.